Quick Links

Sign up for the News Update.


E-mail Article

Athletics

Working...

Ajax Loading Image

 


Story image 1_0
4e788a5fca8e7

Athletics is a privilege, Not a Right

September 19, 2011

Athletics is a Privilege,

Not a Right

Taken from the September 2011edition of "High School Today" a publication of the National Federation of State High School Association 
See full magazine here

 

Prior to one winter season, a youth detention center located

in suburban Philadelphia advertised for basketball games

and, obviously, it was only interested in home contests.

One local high school coach responded, recognizing the educational

opportunity that this potential game offered.

Upon arriving at the youth facility and going through security,

the team was met by an administrator at the center who escorted

the team and coaches to the locker room. Progressing through the

hallway, the administrator remarked, “This will be the most problem-

free game that you’ve ever played. The inmates who will attend

as spectators will be extremely well-behaved. They know that

even the slightest misstep will cause them to lose this privilege.”

The administrator continued, “Other than the normal physical

contact in basketball, there will be no problems with the players either.

They cherish the two hours a day that they get to practice or

play a game and know that they will be removed from the team if

there is ever a problem. And considering what the rest of the day

includes and why the players are here at the center, you have nothing

to worry about.”

One should not draw the conclusion that youth correctional

centers are the same as high schools, even though a few selected

students may argue this point. The concept that participation in

athletics is a privilege should and does also apply to secondary

schools. Receiving a public education is a right, but this guarantee

does not include athletics.

The courts around the country have continually supported the

philosophy that athletic participation is a privilege and not an entitlement

protected under federal or state law. Therefore, this vital

concept also includes implications for athletes and their parents,

and the school.

Since every child has a right to a public education and athletics

is part of the school’s offerings, the concept of participation in athletics

is often misunderstood by athletes and their parents. Being

part of a team may also be taken for granted and assumed that it

is guaranteed.

It is important that athletic department policies and procedures

include explanations of the concept of athletics as a privilege as

well as the responsibilities that have to be met. While the following

is not intended to be all-inclusive, some of these standards

might be included.

 

Failure to meet these standards or responsibilities could result in

the athlete being suspended or removed from a team. It is vital that

these expectations are communicated in as many vehicles – handbooks,

newsletters and Web sites – as possible, so that there is no

misunderstanding by any athlete and his or her parents.

The flip side of understanding the concept involving the privilege of participation and the accompanying responsibilities, is that

the athlete has to meet responsibilities in order to remain as a team

member. Ideally, mom and dad should also be able to reinforce

these expectations with their child and support any decision by the

school.

Emotional pleas, complaints or threats by parents cannot and

should not be allowed to overturn any decision by the athletic department

or school based upon responsibilities that are not met by

athletes. Standards must be uniformly, consistently and fairly upheld.

The integrity of the athletic department and school is at stake.

In rare instances, a parent may threaten to retain legal counsel

in an attempt to intimidate school administrators to ensure a spot

for their son or daughter on an athletic team. It is wise to be proactive

and get advice from your district legal department and, of

course, follow your well-established policies.

If athletes are held to high standards, not only does the school

establish and maintain an incentive for the athletes, it also demonstrates

to the entire student body that responsibilities have to be

met. An additional benefit of taking this approach further establishes

the philosophical position that athletics is an integral part of

the educational offerings within a school system.

When the concept that athletic participation is a privilege is

communicated and used by an athletic department and school, it

presents a great educational opportunity. Privileges are maintained

when responsibilities are met, and if there is neglect with respect

to compliance, there will be consequences. Doesn’t this happen in

life?

The privilege of participation in athletics is not only a basic tenet

of high school athletic programs, it is also a great teachable entity

in and of itself. 

 

• Athletes are expected to be positive role models and ambassadors

for the school. This would include not only at or

during athletic contests, but also throughout the school day

and in transit.

• All team members should treat other athletes, coaches, opponents

and officials with respect. This means listening to

and following directions, being receptive to instruction and

playing within the spirit and rules of the contest. In addition,

hazing and bullying are unacceptable behaviors.

• Class attendance, participating in classroom activities and

exercises, completing assignments and making progress in

the various academic courses are part of the responsibilities

that must be maintained by all athletes.

• All athletes will refrain from smoking, and using illicit drugs

and alcohol. In order to maintain a spot on a team, an athlete

will meet all citizenship standards that are detailed and

expected of all students.

• In order to meet the expectation of serving as a role model

and ambassador, this responsibility also extends to social Internet

sites, chat rooms and online bulletin boards. It is unacceptable

for any athlete to post or communicate anything

that disrupts the educational or athletic environment.

 

Reference

Hoch, D. An Internet Policy for Athletic Departments. Interscholastic

Athletic Administration, Spring 2011, pp. 20-21.

Dr. David Hoch retired last year as the athletic director at Loch Raven High School in

Towson, Maryland (Baltimore County). He assumed this position in 2003 after nine

years as director of athletics at Eastern Technological High School in Baltimore County.

He has 24 years experience coaching basketball, including 14 years on the collegiate

level. Hoch, who has a doctorate in sports management from Temple University, is past

president of the Maryland State Athletic Directors Association, and he formerly was

president of the Maryland State Coaches Association. He has had more than 350 articles

published in professional magazines and journals, as well as two textbook chapters.

He is the author of a new book entitled Blueprint for Better Coaching. Hoch is a

member of the NFHS High School Today Publications Committee.

Photo

 

BY DR. DAVID HOCH, CMAA

 
 

Back To Top